7 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
ThePhD	8c023c54a5	This properly pushes a local function to the table. However, we're having issues because the tables are being constructed without an attachment to sol::state, making it impossible to keep std::shared_ptr's alive that contain the virtual interfaces necessary to handle those goddamn lambdas.	2013-12-07 21:16:23 -05:00
Rapptz	6ff859ba29	Stylistic changes to match the rest of the code	2013-12-02 23:33:23 -05:00
ThePhD	86b16dc61b	GCC is still not compiling, complaining about detail::ltr_pop and not being able to find a proper overload. I'm not sure why it's complaining, I'll have to look in more detail soon.	2013-12-02 20:12:25 -05:00
ThePhD	bf2404bdfd	More style fixes and more attempts to make sure this compiles between GCC and MSVC.	2013-12-02 19:15:23 -05:00
ThePhD	29f171e124	Style fixes and fixes for templates not usually used by MSVC (broken two-phase lookup killing me here. :c) ... Member functions now work as well for set_function. If performance of `new`ing a type ever becomes too large, we can create a custom allocator for the std::shared_ptr's of the types. We can also up-front allocate for the unordered_map as well.	2013-12-02 18:11:25 -05:00
ThePhD	be98a4fdd4	Reformatted to look like Rapptz's style. The following code sample work without error in VS 2013: http://pastebin.com/s4Jbjnht ... It'll be up to @Rapptz's to make further changes to make sure GCC compiles, but the core of the functionality is there and my work is essentially done. Class bindings are up next, but really I don't want to even touch those. :c	2013-12-02 15:42:03 -05:00
ThePhD	f67b21b525	The solution technically works, but there's some stack corruption going on somewhere that I can quite track down, even when calling a void function with no parameters. I'll have to look into it...	2013-12-02 14:22:51 -05:00