d8da9bf709
A couple of minor reasons, combined warrant a PR imo: a) fileChunkRequested is a better signal name than fileRequestChunkReceived, and I don't want to break consistency by reordering words for just this signal b) "request chunk" is parsed by English speakers as a verb-object combination, implying sending the request, not receiving, whereas "chunk requested" is parsed (more correctly) as an adjective-noun combo (in particular, request is a noun not a verb), and thus reads far more like "hey heads up we just got a request" For instance some tests/testing code had some callbacks to *receive* chunk requests, and they were called "tox_file_request_chunk"... to receive a chunk, not request it. Now they're called "tox_file_chunk_request". So yeah... |
||
---|---|---|
auto_tests | ||
build | ||
dist-build | ||
docs | ||
m4 | ||
other | ||
testing | ||
tools | ||
toxav | ||
toxcore | ||
toxdns | ||
toxencryptsave | ||
.gitignore | ||
.travis.yml | ||
AUTHORS | ||
autogen.sh | ||
ChangeLog | ||
configure.ac | ||
COPYING | ||
INSTALL | ||
INSTALL.md | ||
libtoxav.pc.in | ||
libtoxcore.pc.in | ||
Makefile.am | ||
NEWS | ||
README | ||
README.md |
With the rise of governmental monitoring programs, Tox, a FOSS initiative, aims to be an easy to use, all-in-one communication platform that ensures their users full privacy and secure message delivery.
Website | Wiki | Blog | FAQ | Binaries/Downloads | Clients | Compiling | API | Bugs | Help and Suggestions | IRC Channel: #tox@freenode
The Complex Stuff:
UDP vs. TCP
Tox must use UDP simply because hole punching with TCP is not as reliable. However, Tox does use TCP relays as a fallback if it encounters a firewall that prevents UDP hole punching.
Connecting & Communicating
Every peer is represented as a byte string (the public key [Tox ID] of the peer). By using torrent-style DHT, peers can find the IP of other peers by using their Tox ID. Once the IP is obtained, peers can initiate a secure connection with each other. Once the connection is made, peers can exchange messages, send files, start video chats, etc. using encrypted communications.
Q&A:
What are your goals with Tox?
We want Tox to be as simple as possible while remaining as secure as possible.
Why are you doing this? There are already a bunch of free Skype alternatives.
The goal of this project is to create a configuration-free P2P Skype replacement. “Configuration-free” means that the user will simply have to open the program and will be capable of adding people and communicating with them without having to set up an account. There are many so-called Skype replacements, but all of them are either hard to configure for the normal user or suffer from being way too centralized.