Add section on properties from dmaclach, remove some tabs.

This commit is contained in:
pinkerton 2008-09-10 19:31:02 +00:00
parent 48fcffea4c
commit a7dd19342d

View File

@ -34,28 +34,37 @@
<CATEGORY title="Background">
<p>Objective-C is a very dynamic, object-oriented extension of C. It's
<p>
Objective-C is a very dynamic, object-oriented extension of C. It's
designed to be easy to use and read, while enabling sophisticated
object-oriented design. It is the primary development language for new
applications on Mac OS X and the iPhone.</p>
applications on Mac OS X and the iPhone.
</p>
<p>Cocoa is one of the main application frameworks on Mac OS X. It is a
<p>
Cocoa is one of the main application frameworks on Mac OS X. It is a
collection of Objective-C classes that provide for rapid development of
full-featured Mac OS X applications.</p>
full-featured Mac OS X applications.
</p>
<p>Apple has already written a very good, and widely accepted, coding guide
<p>
Apple has already written a very good, and widely accepted, coding guide
for Objective-C. Google has also written a similar guide for C++. This
Objective-C guide aims to be a very natural combination of Apple's and
Google's general recommendations. So, before reading this guide, please make
sure you've read:
<ul>
<li><a href="http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CodingGuidelines/index.html">Apple's
Cocoa Coding Guidelines</a></li>
<li>
<a href="http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CodingGuidelines/index.html">
Apple's Cocoa Coding Guidelines
</a>
</li>
<li>
<div>
<a href="http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml">Google's
Open Source C++ Style Guide</a>
<a href="http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml">
Google's Open Source C++ Style Guide
</a>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
@ -80,8 +89,11 @@
<p>
Google has already released open-source code that conforms to these
guidelines as part of the <a href="http://code.google.com/p/google-toolbox-for-mac/">Google
Toolbox for Mac project</a> (abbreviated GTM throughout this document).
guidelines as part of the
<a href="http://code.google.com/p/google-toolbox-for-mac/">
Google Toolbox for Mac project
</a>
(abbreviated GTM throughout this document).
Code meant to be shared across different projects is a good candidate to
be included in this repository.
</p>
@ -91,8 +103,10 @@
<p>
Note that this guide is not an Objective-C tutorial. We assume that the
reader is familiar with the language. If you are new to Objective-C or
need a refresher, please read <a href="http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/index.html">The
Objective-C Programming Language</a>.
need a refresher, please read
<a href="http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/index.html">
The Objective-C Programming Language
</a>.
</p>
</CATEGORY>
</OVERVIEW>
@ -109,7 +123,7 @@
for an <code>@interface</code> declaration
</p>
<pre>
<CODE_SNIPPET>
// GTMFoo.h
// FooProject
//
@ -147,7 +161,7 @@
- (BOOL)doWorkWithString:(NSString *)blah;
@end
</pre>
</CODE_SNIPPET>
<p>
An example source file, demonstating the correct commenting and spacing
@ -156,7 +170,7 @@
<code>init</code>, and <code>dealloc</code>.
</p>
<pre>
<CODE_SNIPPET>
//
// GTMFoo.m
// FooProject
@ -208,7 +222,7 @@
}
@end
</pre>
</CODE_SNIPPET>
</CATEGORY>
@ -828,11 +842,11 @@
<BODY>
<p>
Unlike C++, Objective-C doesn't have a way to differentiate between
public and private methods &#8212; everything is public. As a result, avoid
placing methods in the public API unless they are actually expected to
be used by a consumer of the class. This helps reduce the likelihood
they'll be called when you're not expecting it. This includes methods
that are being overridden from the parent class. For internal
public and private methods &#8212; everything is public. As a result,
avoid placing methods in the public API unless they are actually
expected to be used by a consumer of the class. This helps reduce the
likelihood they'll be called when you're not expecting it. This includes
methods that are being overridden from the parent class. For internal
implementation methods, use a category defined in the implementation
file as opposed to adding them to the public header.
</p>
@ -1124,8 +1138,176 @@
</BODY>
</STYLEPOINT>
<STYLEPOINT title="Properties">
<SUMMARY>
Properties in general are allowed with the following caveat: properties
are an Objective-C 2.0 feature which will limit your code to running
on the iPhone and MacOS X 10.5 (Leopard) and higher. Dot notation to
access properties is not allowed.
</SUMMARY>
<BODY>
<SUBSECTION title="Naming">
<p>
A property's associated instance variable's name must conform to the
trailing _ requirement. The property's name should be the same as its
associated instance variable without the trailing _.
</p>
<p>
Use the @synthesize directive to rename the property correctly.
</p>
<CODE_SNIPPET>
@interface MyClass : NSObject {
@private
NSString *name_;
}
@property(copy, nonatomic) NSString *name;
@end
@implementation MyClass
@synthesize name = name_;
@end
</CODE_SNIPPET>
</SUBSECTION>
<SUBSECTION title="Location">
<p>
A property's declaration must come immediately after the instance
variable block of a class interface. A property's definition must
come immediately after the <code>@implementation</code> block in a
class definition. They are indented at the same level as the
<code>@interface</code> or <code>@implementation</code> statements
that they are enclosed in.
</p>
<CODE_SNIPPET>
@interface MyClass : NSObject {
@private
NSString *name_;
}
@property(copy, nonatomic) NSString *name;
@end
@implementation MyClass
@synthesize name = name_;
- (id)init {
...
}
@end
</CODE_SNIPPET>
</SUBSECTION>
<SUBSECTION title="Use Copy Attribute For Strings">
<p>
NSString properties should always be declared with the
<code>copy</code> attribute.
</p>
<p>
This logically follows from the requirement that setters for
NSStrings always must use <code>copy</code> instead of
<code>retain</code>.
</p>
</SUBSECTION>
<SUBSECTION title="Never synthesize CFType properties">
<p>
CFTypes should always have the <code>@dynamic</code> implementation
directive.
</p>
<p>
Since CFTypes can't have the <code>retain</code> property
attribute, the developer must handle retaining and releasing the
value themselves. In the rare case that you do actually want
assignment it is better to make that completely clear by actually
implementing the setter and getter and commenting why that is the
case.
</p>
</SUBSECTION>
<SUBSECTION title="List out all implementation directives">
<p>
Use implementation directives for all properties even if they are
<code>@dynamic</code> by default.
</p>
<p>
Even though <code>@dynamic</code> is default, explicitly list it out
with all of the other property implementation directives making it
clear how every property in a class is handled at a single glance.
</p>
<BAD_CODE_SNIPPET>
@interface MyClass : NSObject
@property(readonly) NSString *name;
@end
@implementation MyClass
.
.
.
- (NSString*)name {
return @"foo";
}
@end
</BAD_CODE_SNIPPET>
<CODE_SNIPPET>
@interface MyClass : NSObject
@property(readonly) NSString *name;
@end
@implementation MyClass
@dynamic name;
.
.
.
- (NSString*)name {
return @"foo";
}
@end
</CODE_SNIPPET>
</SUBSECTION>
<SUBSECTION title="Atomicity">
<p>
Be aware of the overhead of properties. By default, all synthesized
setters and getters are atomic. This gives each set and get calls a
substantial amount of synchronization overhead. Declare your
properties <code>nonatomic</code> unless you require atomicity.
</p>
</SUBSECTION>
<SUBSECTION title="Dot notation">
<p>
We do not allow the use of dot notation to access properties for
the following reasons:
</p>
<ol>
<li>
Dot notation is purely syntactic sugar for standard method calls,
whose readability gains are debatable. It just gives you another
way to make method calls.
</li>
<li>
It obscures the type that you are dereferencing. When one sees:
<code>[foo setBar:1]</code> it is immediately clear that you are
working with an Objective-C object. When one sees
<code>foo.bar = 1</code> it is not clear if foo is an object, or
a struct/union/C++ class.
</li>
<li>
It allows you to do method calls that look like getters.
<BAD_CODE_SNIPPET>
NSString *upperCase = @"foo".uppercaseString;
</BAD_CODE_SNIPPET>
which is not only confusing, but difficult to spot in a code review.
</li>
<li>
It hides method calls.
<BAD_CODE_SNIPPET>
bar.value += 10;
</BAD_CODE_SNIPPET>
is actually two separate method calls (one to set and one to get)
and if your properties are not simple you may find a lot of work
being done in a hidden manner.
</li>
</ol>
</SUBSECTION>
</BODY>
</STYLEPOINT>
</CATEGORY>
<CATEGORY title="Cocoa Patterns">
<STYLEPOINT title="Delegate Pattern">