mirror of
https://github.com/google/styleguide.git
synced 2024-03-22 13:11:43 +08:00
Remove blacklist/whitelist from cpplint.py
This commit is contained in:
parent
b448694ab3
commit
08268efb06
20
cpplint/cpplint.py
vendored
20
cpplint/cpplint.py
vendored
|
@ -3866,9 +3866,9 @@ def CheckTrailingSemicolon(filename, clean_lines, linenum, error):
|
|||
|
||||
# Block bodies should not be followed by a semicolon. Due to C++11
|
||||
# brace initialization, there are more places where semicolons are
|
||||
# required than not, so we use a whitelist approach to check these
|
||||
# rather than a blacklist. These are the places where "};" should
|
||||
# be replaced by just "}":
|
||||
# required than not, so we explicitly list the allowed rules rather
|
||||
# than listing the disallowed ones. These are the places where "};"
|
||||
# should be replaced by just "}":
|
||||
# 1. Some flavor of block following closing parenthesis:
|
||||
# for (;;) {};
|
||||
# while (...) {};
|
||||
|
@ -3924,11 +3924,11 @@ def CheckTrailingSemicolon(filename, clean_lines, linenum, error):
|
|||
# - INTERFACE_DEF
|
||||
# - EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED, SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED, LOCKS_EXCLUDED:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# We implement a whitelist of safe macros instead of a blacklist of
|
||||
# We implement a list of safe macros instead of a list of
|
||||
# unsafe macros, even though the latter appears less frequently in
|
||||
# google code and would have been easier to implement. This is because
|
||||
# the downside for getting the whitelist wrong means some extra
|
||||
# semicolons, while the downside for getting the blacklist wrong
|
||||
# the downside for getting the allowed checks wrong means some extra
|
||||
# semicolons, while the downside for getting disallowed checks wrong
|
||||
# would result in compile errors.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# In addition to macros, we also don't want to warn on
|
||||
|
@ -5124,19 +5124,19 @@ def CheckForNonConstReference(filename, clean_lines, linenum,
|
|||
#
|
||||
# We also accept & in static_assert, which looks like a function but
|
||||
# it's actually a declaration expression.
|
||||
whitelisted_functions = (r'(?:[sS]wap(?:<\w:+>)?|'
|
||||
allowed_functions = (r'(?:[sS]wap(?:<\w:+>)?|'
|
||||
r'operator\s*[<>][<>]|'
|
||||
r'static_assert|COMPILE_ASSERT'
|
||||
r')\s*\(')
|
||||
if Search(whitelisted_functions, line):
|
||||
if Search(allowed_functions, line):
|
||||
return
|
||||
elif not Search(r'\S+\([^)]*$', line):
|
||||
# Don't see a whitelisted function on this line. Actually we
|
||||
# Don't see an allowed function on this line. Actually we
|
||||
# didn't see any function name on this line, so this is likely a
|
||||
# multi-line parameter list. Try a bit harder to catch this case.
|
||||
for i in xrange(2):
|
||||
if (linenum > i and
|
||||
Search(whitelisted_functions, clean_lines.elided[linenum - i - 1])):
|
||||
Search(allowed_functions, clean_lines.elided[linenum - i - 1])):
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
decls = ReplaceAll(r'{[^}]*}', ' ', line) # exclude function body
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user