Added tests to ensure the derived/base case doesn't slip by us again!

This commit is contained in:
ThePhD 2014-05-25 14:41:06 -04:00
parent 936d52b6e6
commit b153b34334

View File

@ -50,6 +50,27 @@ int plop_xyz(int x, int y, std::string z) {
return 11;
}
class Base {
public:
Base(int a_num) : m_num(a_num) { }
int get_num() {
return m_num;
}
protected:
int m_num;
};
class Derived : public Base {
public:
Derived(int a_num) : Base(a_num) { }
int get_num_10() {
return 10 * m_num;
}
};
TEST_CASE("simple/set_global", "Check if the set_global works properly.") {
sol::state lua;
@ -448,3 +469,27 @@ TEST_CASE("tables/userdata utility", "Show internal management of classes regist
REQUIRE(bresult == 1);
REQUIRE(cresult == 3);
}
TEST_CASE("tables/userdata utility derived", "userdata classes must play nice when a derived class does not overload a publically visible base function") {
sol::state lua;
lua.open_libraries(sol::lib::base);
sol::constructors<sol::types<int>> basector;
sol::userdata<Base> baseuserdata("Base", basector, "get_num", &Base::get_num);
lua.set_userdata(baseuserdata);
lua.script("base = Base.new(5)");
lua.script("print(base:get_num())");
sol::constructors<sol::types<int>> derivedctor;
sol::userdata<Derived> deriveduserdata("Derived", derivedctor, "get_num", &Derived::get_num, "get_num_10", &Derived::get_num_10);
lua.set_userdata(deriveduserdata);
lua.script("derived = Derived.new(7)");
lua.script("dgn10 = derived:get_num_10()\nprint(dgn10)");
lua.script("dgn = derived:get_num()\nprint(dgn)");
REQUIRE((lua.get<int>("dgn10") == 70));
REQUIRE((lua.get<int>("dgn") == 7));
}