StarMirror/qTox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/qTox/qTox.git synced 2024-03-22 14:00:36 +08:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(preview): handle libexif missing fields, don't accept 0-value orientation

Browse Source 
Last fix was a hack when the error was actually us using the default 0 value of
orientation since the returned ExifData was null.
This commit is contained in:
Anthony Bilinski 2020-06-05 01:54:54 -07:00
parent 5dcea74db5
commit 535b01a841
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 2AA8E0DA1B31FB3C
1 changed files with 6 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
src/model/exiftransform.cpp
View File

@ -36,20 +36,18 @@ namespace ExifTransform
return Orientation::TopLeft;
}
int orientation = 0;
const ExifByteOrder byteOrder = exif_data_get_byte_order(exifData);
const ExifEntry* const exifEntry = exif_data_get_entry(exifData, EXIF_TAG_ORIENTATION);
if (exifEntry) {
orientation = exif_get_short(exifEntry->data, byteOrder);
if (!exifEntry) {
exif_data_free(exifData);
return Orientation::TopLeft;
}
const int orientation = exif_get_short(exifEntry->data, byteOrder);
exif_data_free(exifData);
switch (orientation){
case 0:
// Exif spec defines 1-8 only, but when the orientation field isn't explcitly defined, we read 0 from
// libexif. It seems like exif_data_get_entry should return null in that case rather than saying the entry
// is present but with a value of zero.
return Orientation::TopLeft;
case 1:
return Orientation::TopLeft;
case 2: