From f6e94fb504c289558d09e8924c3ff401222cce40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carl Reinke <mindless2112@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 19:39:12 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo: "loose" to "lose"

---
 CppCoreGuidelines.md | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/CppCoreGuidelines.md b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
index 4c5d4bd..792f155 100644
--- a/CppCoreGuidelines.md
+++ b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
@@ -629,14 +629,14 @@ This design carries the number of elements along as an integral part of an objec
 		return v;
 	}
 
-	unique_ptr<int[]> f6(int n)	// bad: looses n
+	unique_ptr<int[]> f6(int n)	// bad: loses n
 	{
 		auto p = make_unique<int[]>(n);
 		// ... initialize *p ...
 		return p;
 	}
 
-	owner<int*> f7(int n)	// bad: looses n and we might forget to delete
+	owner<int*> f7(int n)	// bad: loses n and we might forget to delete
 	{
 		owner<int*> p = new int[n];
 		// ... initialize *p ...
@@ -5904,7 +5904,7 @@ Write your own factory wrapper if there is not one already.
 <a name ="Rr-ap"></a>
 ### R.14: ??? array vs. pointer parameter
 
-**Reason**: An array decays to a pointer, thereby loosing its size, opening the opportunity for range errors.
+**Reason**: An array decays to a pointer, thereby losing its size, opening the opportunity for range errors.
 
 **Example**: