Fix typos: change it's to its where appropriate

This commit is contained in:
Tom Walsh 2015-09-19 22:01:34 -04:00
parent 8bd3d4e37a
commit cf76c9d4e1

View File

@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ Also, we assume that the rules will be refined over time to make them more preci
A rule is aimed at being simple, rather than carefully phrased to mention every alternative and special case.
Such information is found in the **Alternative** paragraphs and the [Discussion](#S-discussion) sections.
If you don't understand a rule or disagree with it, please visit it's **Discussion**.
If you don't understand a rule or disagree with it, please visit its **Discussion**.
If you feel that a discussion is missing or incomplete, send us an email.
This is not a language manual.
@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@ In that case, mark owning pointers using `owner` :
}
This tells analysis tools that `res` is an owner.
That is, it's value must be `delete`d or transferred to another owner, as is done here by the `return`.
That is, its value must be `delete`d or transferred to another owner, as is done here by the `return`.
`owner` is used similarly in the implementation of resource handles.
@ -2836,7 +2836,7 @@ You need a reason (use cases) for using a hierarchy.
// ...
}
If a class can be part of a hierarchy, we (in real code if not necessarily in small examples) must manipulate it's objects through pointers or references.
If a class can be part of a hierarchy, we (in real code if not necessarily in small examples) must manipulate its objects through pointers or references.
That implies more memory overhead, more allocations and deallocations, and more run-time overhead to perform the resulting indiretions.
**Note**: Concrete types can be stack allocated and be members of other classes.
@ -3059,7 +3059,7 @@ These operations disagree about copy semantics. This will lead to confusion and
Does this class need a destructor is a surprisingly powerful design question.
For most classes the answer is "no" either because the class holds no resources or because destruction is handled by [the rule of zero](#Rc-zero);
that is, it's members can take care of themselves as concerns destruction.
that is, its members can take care of themselves as concerns destruction.
If the answer is "yes", much of the design of the class follows (see [the rule of five](#Rc-five).
@ -4606,7 +4606,7 @@ Of course there are way of making `==` work in a hierarchy, but the naive approa
## C.con: Containers and other resource handles
A container is an object holding a sequence of objects of some type; `std::vector` is the archetypical container.
A resource handle is a class that owns a resource; `std::vector` is the typical resource handle; it's resource is its sequence of elements.
A resource handle is a class that owns a resource; `std::vector` is the typical resource handle; its resource is its sequence of elements.
Summary of container rules: