From 9960c7dd7fcbef1aa49d86e3a64bd740f02bd472 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: rico-chet <rico-chet@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 20:37:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [SF.10] Fix annotation of the _bad_ example (#1627)

The _bad_ example wasn't annotated as such and a perfectly fine function
name was marked bad.

Annotate the example as bad and remove the misleading function name
annotation.
---
 CppCoreGuidelines.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/CppCoreGuidelines.md b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
index 14e4f01..5983e6c 100644
--- a/CppCoreGuidelines.md
+++ b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
@@ -19096,12 +19096,12 @@ Avoid surprises.
 Avoid having to change `#include`s if an `#include`d header changes.
 Avoid accidentally becoming dependent on implementation details and logically separate entities included in a header.
 
-##### Example
+##### Example, bad
 
     #include <iostream>
     using namespace std;
 
-    void use()                  // bad
+    void use()
     {
         string s;
         cin >> s;               // fine