From 71128814293b4244ba029b21a503291360068af0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Rodriguez <thatbrod@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:06:21 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] T.40 typo: `find` to `find_if`

`std::find` accepts a value, not a function object.  `std::find_if` was the intended function.
---
 CppCoreGuidelines.md | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/CppCoreGuidelines.md b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
index 74f0441..f200708 100644
--- a/CppCoreGuidelines.md
+++ b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
@@ -9058,9 +9058,9 @@ In general, passing function objects give better performance than passing pointe
 	sort(v, greater<>);								// function object
 
 	bool greater_than_7(double x) { return x>7; }
-	auto x = find(v, greater_than_7);				// pointer to function: inflexible
-	auto y = find(v, [](double x) { return x>7; });	// function object: carries the needed data
-	auto y = find(v, Greater_than<double>(7));		// function object: carries the needed data
+	auto x = find_if(v, greater_than_7);				// pointer to function: inflexible
+	auto y = find_if(v, [](double x) { return x>7; });	// function object: carries the needed data
+	auto y = find_if(v, Greater_than<double>(7));		// function object: carries the needed data
 
 	??? these lambdas are crying out for auto parameters -- any objection to making the change?