Clarify that synchronized_value is not standardised yet

This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Wakely 2017-03-27 20:05:14 +01:00
parent 85543a94e9
commit 65aa60fe10

View File

@ -12718,7 +12718,8 @@ Flag all unnamed `lock_guard`s and `unique_lock`s.
It should be obvious to a reader that the data is to be guarded and how. This decreases the chance of the wrong mutex being locked, or the mutex not being locked.
Using a `synchronized_value<T>` (see the [WG21 proposal](http://wg21.link/p0290)) ensures that the data has a mutex, and the right mutex is locked when the data is accessed.
Using a `synchronized_value<T>` ensures that the data has a mutex, and the right mutex is locked when the data is accessed.
See the [WG21 proposal](http://wg21.link/p0290)) to add `synchronized_value` to a future TS or revision of the C++ standard.
##### Example