Applied suggestion in PR #343.

This commit is contained in:
hsutter 2015-12-29 10:46:58 -08:00
parent f013c1b22d
commit 47a1405707

View File

@ -10271,15 +10271,25 @@ Immutable objects are easier to reason about, so make object non-`const` only wh
##### Reason ##### Reason
??? A member function should be marked `const` unless it changes the object's observable state.
##### Example ##### Example; bad
??? class Point {
int x, y;
public:
int getx() { return x; } // BAD, should be const as it doesn't modify the object's state
// ...
};
void f(const Point& pt) {
int x = pt.getx(); // ERROR, doesn't compile because getx was not marked const
}
##### Enforcement ##### Enforcement
??? * Flag a member function that is not marked `const`, but that could be `const` because its definition does not modify any member variable.
### <a name="Rconst-ref"></a> Con.3: By default, pass pointers and references to `const`s ### <a name="Rconst-ref"></a> Con.3: By default, pass pointers and references to `const`s