diff --git a/CppCoreGuidelines.md b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
index 3c8d730..847fbb7 100644
--- a/CppCoreGuidelines.md
+++ b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
@@ -2229,7 +2229,8 @@ The (in)famous factorial:
         return x;
     }
 
-This is C++14. For C++11, use a recursive formulation of `fac()`.
+This is C++14.
+For C++11, use a recursive formulation of `fac()`.
 
 ##### Note
 
@@ -2259,6 +2260,12 @@ it just guarantees that the function can be evaluated at compile time for consta
 
 This is usually a very good thing.
 
+When given a non-constant argument, a `constexpr` function can throw.
+If you consider exiting by throwing a side-effect, a `constexpr` function isn't completely pure;
+if not, this is not an issue.
+??? A question for the committe: can a constructor for an exception thrown by a `constexpr` function modify state?
+"No" would be a nice answer that matches most practice.
+
 ##### Note
 
 Don't try to make all functions `constexpr`.
@@ -2439,6 +2446,12 @@ Pure functions are easier to reason about, sometimes easier to optimize (and eve
 
 `constexpr` functions are pure.
 
+When given a non-constant argument, a `constexpr` function can throw.
+If you consider exiting by throwing a side-effect, a `constexpr` function isn't completely pure;
+if not, this is not an issue.
+??? A question for the committe: can a constructor for an exception thrown by a `constexpr` function modify state?
+"No" would be a nice answer that matches most practice.
+
 ##### Enforcement
 
 Not possible.